22/7/14

Video

Reblog Via:

22/7/14

Photo

Reblog Via:

aseaofquotes:

Suzanne Young, The Treatment

aseaofquotes:

Suzanne Young, The Treatment

10/7/14

Video

Reblog Via:

nannaia:

Evolution of Chinese Clothing and Cheongsam

the refs: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y246/lilsuika/refs.jpg

Alt: Timeline as 1 cohesive file at http://lilsuika.deviantart.com/

Chinese clothing has approximately 5,000 years of history behind it, but regrettably I am only able to cover 2,500 years in this fashion timeline. I began with the Han dynasty as the term hanfu (meaning: dress of ethnic Chinese people) was coined in that period. Please bear in mind that this is only a generalized timeline of Chinese clothing primarily featuring aristocratic and upper-class ethnic Han Chinese women (the exceptions are Fig. 8 (dancer) and Fig. 11 (maid, due to the fact I couldn’t find many paintings in the Yuan period)).

My resources are mainly the books: 5,000 years of Chinese Costume, China Chic: East Meets West, Changing Clothes in China: Fashion, History, Nation, and Hong Kong Museum of History. 5,000 years of Chinese Costume is an invaluable resource in English (though sadly currently out of print), I would highly recommend this book if you can get your hands on it.

NOTES OF INTEREST:

Han Dynasty:

“In the Han Dynasty, as of old, the one-piece garment remained the formal dress for women. However, it was somewhat different from that of the Warring States Period, in that it had an increased number of curves in the front and broadened lower hems. Close-fitting at the waist, it was always tied with a silk girdle.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 32)

Wei and Jin dynasties:

“On the whole, the costumes of the Wei and Jin period still followed the patterns of Qin and Han.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 54)

“From the costumes worn by the benefactors in the Dunhuang murals and the costumes of the pottery figurines unearthed in Louyang, it can be seen that women’s costumes in the period of Wei and Jin were generally large and loose. The upper garment opened at the front and was tied at the waist. The sleeves were broad and fringed at the cuffs with decorative borders of a different colour. The skirt had spaced coloured stripes and was tied with a white silk band at the waist. There was also an apron between the upper garment and skirt for the purpose of fastening the waist. Apart from wearing a multi-coloured skirt, women also wore other kinds such as the crimson gauze-covered skirt, the red-blue striped gauze double skirt, and the barrel-shaped red gauze skirt. Many of these styles are mentioned in  historical records.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 65)

Southern and Northern Dynasties:

“During the Wei, Jin and the Southern and Northern Dynasties, though men no longer wore the traditional one-piece garment, some women continued to do so. However, the style was quite different from that seen in the Han Dynasty. Typically the women’s dress was decorated with xian and shao. The latter refers to pieces of silk cloth sewn onto the lower hem of the dress, which were wide at the top and narrow at the bottom, so that triangles were formed overlapping each other. Xian refers to some relatively long ribbons which extended from the short-cut skirt. While the wearer was walking, these lengthy ribbons made the sharp corners n the lower hem wave like a flying swallow, hence the Chinese phrase ‘beautiful ribbons and flying swallowtail’.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 62)

“During the Southern and Northern Dynasties, costumes underwent further changes in style. The long flying ribbons were no longer seen and the swallowtailed corners became enlarged. As a result the flying ribbons and swallowtailed corners were combined into one.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 62)

Sui Dynasty:

“During the period of the Sui and early Tang, a short jacket with tight sleeves was worn in conjunction with a tight long skirt whose waist was fastened almost to the armpits with a silk ribbon. In the ensuing century, the style of this costume remained basically the same, except for some minor changes such as letting out the jacket and/or its sleeves.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 88)

Tang Dynasty:

“The Tang Dynasty was the most prosperous period in China’s feudal society. Changan (now Xian, Shananxi Province), the capital, was the political, economic and cultural centre of the nation. […] Residents in Changan included people of such nationalities as Huihe (Uygur,) Tubo (Tibetan), and Nanzhao (Yi), and even Japanese, Xinluo (Korean), Persian and Arabian. Meanwhile, people frequently travelled to and fro between countries like Vietnam, India and the East Roman Empire and Changan, thus spreading Chinese culture to other parts of the world.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 76)

“…all the national minorities and foreign envoys who thronged the streets of Changan also contributed something of their own culture to the Tang. Consequently, paintings, carvings, music and dances of the Tang absorbed something of foreign skills and styles. The Tang government adopted the policy of taking in every exotic form whether or hats or clothing, so that Tang costumes became increasingly picturesque and beautiful.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 88)

“Women of the Tang Dynasty paid particular attention to facial appearance, and the application of powder or even rouge was common practice. Some women’s foreheads were painted dark yellow and the dai (a kind of dark blue pigment) was used to paint their eyebrows into different shapes that were called dai mei (painted eyebrows) in general.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 89)

“In the years of Tianbao during Emperor Xuanzong’s reign, women used to wear men’s costumes. This was not only a fashion among commoners, but also for a time it spread to the imperial court and became customary for women of high birth.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 89)

Song Dynasty

“The hairstyle of the women of the Song Dynasty still followed the fashion of the later period of the Tang Dynasty, the high bun being the favoured style. Women’s buns were often more than a foot in height.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 107)

“Women’s upper garments consisted mainly of coat, blouse, loose-sleeved dress, over-dress, short-sleeved jacket and vest. The lower garment was mostly a skirt.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 107)

“Women in the Song Dynasty seldom wore boots, since binding the feet had become fashionable.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 107)

“Although historians do not know exactly how or why foot binding began, it was apparently initially associated with dancers at the imperial court and professional female entertainers in the capital. During the Song dynasty (960-1279) the practice spread from the palace and entertainment quarters into the homes of the elite. ‘By the thirteenth century, archeological evidence shows clearly that foot-binding was practiced among the daughters and wives of officials,’ reports Patricia Buckley Ebrey […] Over the course of the next few centuries foot binding became increasingly common among gentry families, and the practice eventually penetrated the mass of the Chinese people.” (Chinese Chic: East Meets West, pg. 37-38)

Yuan Dynasty:

“Han women continued to wear the jacket and skirt. However, the choice of darker shades and buttoning on the left showed Mongolian influence.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 131)

“After the Mongols settled down in the Central Plains, Mongolian customs and costumes also had their influence on those of the Han people. While remaining the main costume for Han women, the jacket and skirt had deviated greatly in style from those of the Tang and Song periods. Tight-fitting garments gave way to big, loose ones; and collar, sleeves and skirt became straight. In addition, lighter more serene colours gained preference.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 142)

Ming Dynasty:

“The clothing for women in the Ming Dynasty consisted mainly of gowns, coats, rosy capes, over-dresses with or without sleeves, and skirts. These styles were imitations of ones first seen in the Tang and Song Dynasties. However, the openings were on the right-hand side, according to the Han Dynasty convention.” ((5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 147)

“The formal dress for commoners could only be made of coarse purple cloth, and no gold embroidery was allowed. Gowns could only in such light colours as purple, green and pink; and in no case should crimson, reddish blue or yellow be used. These regulations were observed for over a decade, and it was not until the 14th year of Hong Wu that minor changes were made.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 147)

Qing Dynasty

When China fell under Manchurian rule, Chinese men were forced to adopt Manchurian customs. As a sign of submission, the new government made a decree that men must shave their head and wear the Manchurian queue or lose their heads. Many choose the latter.

On the other hand, Chinese women were not pressured to adopt Manchurian clothing and fashions. “Women, in general, wore skirts as their lower garments, and red skirts were for women of position. At first, there were still the “phoenix-tail” skirt and the “moonlight” skirt and others from the Ming tradition. However the styles evolved with the passage of time: some skirts were adorned with ribbons that floated in the air when one walked; some had little bells fastened under them: others had their lower edge embroidered with wavy designs. As the dynasty drew to an end, the wearing of trousers became the fashion among commoner women. There were trousers with full crotches and over trousers, both made of silk embroidered with patters.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 173)

The Manchurians attempted several times to eradicate the practice of foot-binding, but were largely unsuccessful. Manchurian women admired the gait of bound women but were effectively banned from practicing food-binding. Hence, a “flower pot shoe” later came into creation and it allowed its wearer the same unsteady gait but without any need for foot-binding. 

Republic Era

“Ever since the Tang Dynasty, the design of Chinese women’s costumes had kept to the same straight style: flat and straight lines for the chest, shoulders and hips, with few curves visible; and it was not until the 1920’s that Chinese women came to appreciate ‘the beauty of curves’, and to pay attention to figure when cutting and making up dresses, instead of adhering to the traditional style.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 214)

“The most popular item of a Chinese woman’s wardrobe in modern times was the qi pao. Originall the dress of the Manchus, it was adopted by Han women in the 1920s. Modifications and improvements were then made so that for a time, it became the most fashionable form of dress for women in China.

Two main factors account for women’s general preference for the qi pao: first, it was economical and convenient to wear.” (5,000 years of Chinese Costume, pg. 214-215)

Women traditionally bound their breasts in the Ming and Qing dynasties with tight fitting vests and continued to do so in the early 20th century.

“The vests were called xiaomajia ‘little vest’ or xiaoshan ‘little shirt” “used by Chinese women as underclothing for the upper part of the body.” (Changing Clothes in China: Fashion, History, Nation: Finnane pg 162) “Doudu [is] a sort of apron for the upper body […] in former times the doudu had been worn by everyone, old and young, male and female. The young wore red, the middle-aged wore white or grey-green, the elderly wore black. A little pocket sewn into the top was used by adults to secrete them money and by children their sweets. When a girl got engaged, she would show off her embroidery skills by sending an elaborately worked doudu to her fiancé, decorated with bats for good forturne and pomegranates, symbolizing many sons.” (Changing Clothes in China: Fashion, History, Nation: Finnane pg 162)

A ban on bound breasts began in 1927, in which the government started advocating for the “Natural Breast Movement”. Despite this, bound breasts still widely continued into the 1930s. The government also banned earrings as it fell under the criteria of deforming the natural body. The 1930s also saw the introduction of the western/French bra come to Shanghai.

“The little vest was designed to constrain the breasts and streamline the body. Such a garment was necessary to look comme il faut around 1908, when (as J. Dyer Ball observed): ‘fashion decreed that jackets should fit tight, though not yielding to the contours of the figure, except in the slightest degree, as such an exposure of the body would be considered immodest.’ It became necessary again in the mid-twenties, when the jacket-blouse—a garment cut on rounded lines – began to give way to the qipao. At this stage, darts were not used to tailor the bodice or upper part of the qipao, nor would they be till the mid-fifties. The most that could be done by way of further fitting the qipao to the bosom was to stretch the material at the right places through ironing. Under these circumstances, breast-binding must have made the tailor’s task easier.” (Finnane 163, Changing Clothes in China: Fashion, History, Nation)

Successful eradication of bound feet would not come until the 1949 when the People’s Republic of China came into power.

1950s-1960’s

Under the People’s Republic of China, very few mainland women wore the cheongsam, save for ceremonial attire. Clothing became de-sexualized for mainlanders.

It was the flip side in Hong Kong, as the cheongsam continued its function as everyday wear which lasted until the late 1960s. The cheongsam in the 1950s and 1960s became even tighter fitting to further accentuate feminine curves. Western clothing became the default after the late 1960s, though the cheongsam continued to survive as uniforms for students (who donned a looser and androgynous version), waitresses, brides, and beauty contestants.

21st century

Designers today are creating new forms of the qipao/cheongsam. The fish tail appears to be a current popular trend.

09/7/14

Video

Reblog Via:

archistudent:

Some photos from NUS Architecture’s City Exhibition: HEAR | HERE.

The exhibition is on until 25th July at The URA Centre, so if you’re in Singapore and in the area, do drop by!

Credits to Jasmine for the photos!

23/6/14

Photo

Reblog Via:

psychopaths-get-bored:

Erik to Charles, probably

psychopaths-get-bored:

Erik to Charles, probably

06/6/14

Video

Reblog Via:

how literally everyone thinks they’re a couple or they are in love with each other or should be together

(x)

(Source: darlingbenny)

05/6/14

Quote

Reblog Via:

“You have no responsibility to live up to what other people think you ought to accomplish. I have no responsibility to be like they expect me to be. It’s their mistake, not my failing.”

Richard Feynman

(via observando)

26/4/14

Video

Reblog Via:

23/4/14

Video

Reblog Via:

likeafieldmouse:

Luke Dowd

1. Chamberlain One

2. Color Chart

3. Drawing

4. Floor

5. Unfolded Moon

6. Gray Window

7. Chamberlain Two

8. Black & White Screen

22/3/14

Video

Reblog Via:

likeafieldmouse:

Analia Saban

1. Diamond Decant (Black and White Pigments) with Three Brushstrokes

2. Decant (Black and White Pigments)

3. Representation of a Chair

4. Erosion (Grid)

5. Erosion (Vase of Flowers)

6. Erosion (Cube)

7. Kohler 5931 Kitchen Sink #3

8. Paint (Black) #1

9. Acrylic in Canvas with Ruptures

10. Acrylic in Canvas with Ruptures: Two-point Perspective

22/3/14

Quote

Reblog Via:

“Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.”

— Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man (via quotes-shape-us)

21/3/14

Video

Reblog Via:

shootbadcabbies:

he’s just impatient to get him ready for their adventures 

18/3/14

Photo

Reblog Via:

aseaofquotes:

Albert Camus, Notebooks
Submitted by litafficionado.

aseaofquotes:

Albert Camus, Notebooks

Submitted by litafficionado.

09/2/14

Video

Reblog Via:

theonlymagicleftisart:

This French Short Film “Oppressed Majority” by Éléonore Pourriat Shows Men What It’s Really Like To Be A Woman In A Sexist Society by Reversing Their Roles In An Alternate Reality.

What a clever black comedy that has a lot of culturally relevant points.

09/2/14

Photo

Reblog Via:

we-are-star-stuff:

What would happen to your voice if you just stopped talking?
What if tomorrow you woke up and decided that you were going to stop speaking? Not for a day, not for a week — but for, say, twenty years. What effect would if have on your body? What effect would if have on your mind?
Before we begin, it’s important to clarify that we’re talking about the effects of long-term, self-imposed silence. The deliberate cessation of speech is fundamentally different from pathological conditions that affect our ability to talk, like dysarthria, dysphonia and aphonia. These are disorders that can be attributed to brain injury, neurological malfunction, and/or the impairment of muscles that help produce speech. We’ll reference these conditions later on.
But for the purposes of our discussion, we assume an otherwise healthy person who, for whatever reason, has chosen to stop talking.
Make Some Noise (or Don’t)
Phonation, or the production of speech, relies on the complex coordination of several anatomical features, but it’s helpful to think of it as a sequence-dependent process that starts in your brain, proceeds through your voice box, and ends in the resonating cavities of your throat, mouth and nose. Tinker with any part of the sequence and you’ll hear changes at the end of the line. Singer Barbra Streisand (who is famous not only for her impressive vocal abilities, but her large nose), when asked what she thought it was that made her sound so unique, once attributed her voice to the sound-modulating qualities of her deviated septum.
Even more important than her nose, however, are Streisand’s vocal cords. Also known as vocal folds, these two bands of smooth muscle are positioned opposite one another in your larynx, or voice box. When you decide to speak, your brain signals for these vocal folds to snap together as air from the lungs is forced between them by your diaphragm, a sheet of muscle positioned below your lungs. This causes your folds to vibrate. If you’ve never seen it before, this vibration makes for pretty excellent viewing material.
These vibrations produce sound that is modulated by the resonating cavities of your throat, nose and mouth before finally leaving your body. The pitch, volume and tone of your voice is determined by the strength, size and shape of your vocal cords, the force with which air is issued through them, and the shape of your resonating cavities.
Singers train the muscles required for phonation the way a power lifter trains the muscles needed to perform a deadlift. If intense use and exercise can augment the strength, size, shape and command of one’s vocal musculature, then intense dis-use of those muscles would have the opposite effect. If you woke up tomorrow and decided not to speak for the next 20 years, only to resume speaking later in life, it stands to reason you’d see some differences.
Your Multifunctional Vocal Muscles
We couldn’t track down any studies that have examined the long-term physiological effects of voluntary speech-cessation, so we spoke to some experts instead. And while none of them were able to refer us to peer-reviewed research, they were kind enough to oblige us and speculate on the matter.
When we asked Katie Plattner, a speech language pathologist, what would happen to your voice if you stopped speaking voluntarily, her answer was clear: “probably not much.”
The reason, she says, has to do with the fact that most of the muscles we use to speak get used all the time for things other than talking. We need our diaphragms to breathe, and the muscles we use to open and close our vocal cords are involved in everything from coughing, to clearing one’s voice, to swallowing, to – get this – forcing out a stubborn poop. “You might have some trouble with vocal control” she explains, “just because you’d be out of practice, but your vocal folds would probably still be in fine shape. It’s not like they’d completely atrophy or anything.”
Plattner’s informed opinion is supported by stories like that of Terry Wallis, who, in 2003, awoke from a 19-year coma (during which time he did not speak), and managed to utter “Mom. Pepsi. Milk.” If Wallis’ vocal cords had been weakened by his 19-year bout of silence, they were still strong enough to ask for a refreshment.
Voice recovery has also been observed in patients with psychogenic aphonia (a poorly understood form of pathological voicelessness that usually occurs in patients with underlying psychological problems), even in people who could not speak for several years. One woman regained her voice during yoga, while another got it back the day before she would have lost her job. “For patients exhibiting the symptom of voicelessness” write the authors of this study, “not eliciting the voice immediately will not lead to a permanent aphonia.”
As for vocal fatigue, Plattner says that might be the bigger issue. One benefit of daily vocal exercise is a developed resistance to stress placed on the tissues of the voice box during prolonged bouts of singing or talking. Even if swallowing, coughing and pooping keeps your voice muscles from atrophying, it’s possible that limiting the utilization of these muscles might make them more susceptible to fatigue. Underutilized vocal muscles might also affect your range of pitch, which is something that can be trained through talking, and even more so through singing.
Brain Changes
But what about neurological changes – is there reason to believe that choosing not to speak could lead to adaptation in the brain?
According to Bijan Pesaran, an associate professor in NYU’s Center for Neural Science and an expert on the brain’s role in speech – there is. “Musicians with expert skills have enlarged [neural] representations for development processing, the same way athletes tend to have enlarged representations for spatial cognition.” Our ability to speak, and speak well, says Pesaran, is not unlike a well-developed skill. Using those parts of the brain dedicated to speech will make them stronger. Underusing them will make them weaker.
"If you stop speaking, the number of neurons that are active, or could be active, for that process will get smaller, and the neurons that were once active for speech will become co-opted to do other things". The most striking examples of this kind of neural reorganization occur when input of the function in question is cut off entirely. If you lose a finger, for example, the neural representations of the neighboring fingers get bigger. Sever someone’s optic nerve, and the neurons devoted to vision will be co-opted by neurons associated with other cognitive functions. “This is one reason blind people tend to have really excellent audio acuity” says Pesaran.
But at the same time, it’s reasonable to assume that the neural reorganization experienced by someone who chooses not to speak would be less dramatic than someone who – whether due to brain injury or nerve damage – is unable to speak. What’s more, says Pesaran, speech is about more than talking. “Even if you stop speaking, your not going to stop listening” he explains. The regions that handle motor control, and the ones that facilitate the production of speech, will probably shrink, “but the ones devoted to perception probably won’t change much if the person leads an otherwise normal social life.” That listening and speaking are all part of an integrated system could very well slow the rate at which neurons devoted to speech become co-opted by other cognitive processes.
[source]

we-are-star-stuff:

What would happen to your voice if you just stopped talking?

What if tomorrow you woke up and decided that you were going to stop speaking? Not for a day, not for a week — but for, say, twenty years. What effect would if have on your body? What effect would if have on your mind?

Before we begin, it’s important to clarify that we’re talking about the effects of long-term, self-imposed silence. The deliberate cessation of speech is fundamentally different from pathological conditions that affect our ability to talk, like dysarthriadysphonia and aphonia. These are disorders that can be attributed to brain injury, neurological malfunction, and/or the impairment of muscles that help produce speech. We’ll reference these conditions later on.

But for the purposes of our discussion, we assume an otherwise healthy person who, for whatever reason, has chosen to stop talking.

Make Some Noise (or Don’t)

Phonation, or the production of speech, relies on the complex coordination of several anatomical features, but it’s helpful to think of it as a sequence-dependent process that starts in your brain, proceeds through your voice box, and ends in the resonating cavities of your throat, mouth and nose. Tinker with any part of the sequence and you’ll hear changes at the end of the line. Singer Barbra Streisand (who is famous not only for her impressive vocal abilities, but her large nose), when asked what she thought it was that made her sound so unique, once attributed her voice to the sound-modulating qualities of her deviated septum.

Even more important than her nose, however, are Streisand’s vocal cords. Also known as vocal folds, these two bands of smooth muscle are positioned opposite one another in your larynx, or voice box. When you decide to speak, your brain signals for these vocal folds to snap together as air from the lungs is forced between them by your diaphragm, a sheet of muscle positioned below your lungs. This causes your folds to vibrate. If you’ve never seen it before, this vibration makes for pretty excellent viewing material.

These vibrations produce sound that is modulated by the resonating cavities of your throat, nose and mouth before finally leaving your body. The pitch, volume and tone of your voice is determined by the strength, size and shape of your vocal cords, the force with which air is issued through them, and the shape of your resonating cavities.

Singers train the muscles required for phonation the way a power lifter trains the muscles needed to perform a deadlift. If intense use and exercise can augment the strength, size, shape and command of one’s vocal musculature, then intense dis-use of those muscles would have the opposite effect. If you woke up tomorrow and decided not to speak for the next 20 years, only to resume speaking later in life, it stands to reason you’d see some differences.

Your Multifunctional Vocal Muscles

We couldn’t track down any studies that have examined the long-term physiological effects of voluntary speech-cessation, so we spoke to some experts instead. And while none of them were able to refer us to peer-reviewed research, they were kind enough to oblige us and speculate on the matter.

When we asked Katie Plattner, a speech language pathologist, what would happen to your voice if you stopped speaking voluntarily, her answer was clear: “probably not much.”

The reason, she says, has to do with the fact that most of the muscles we use to speak get used all the time for things other than talking. We need our diaphragms to breathe, and the muscles we use to open and close our vocal cords are involved in everything from coughing, to clearing one’s voice, to swallowing, to – get this – forcing out a stubborn poop. “You might have some trouble with vocal control” she explains, “just because you’d be out of practice, but your vocal folds would probably still be in fine shape. It’s not like they’d completely atrophy or anything.”

Plattner’s informed opinion is supported by stories like that of Terry Wallis, who, in 2003, awoke from a 19-year coma (during which time he did not speak), and managed to utter “Mom. Pepsi. Milk.” If Wallis’ vocal cords had been weakened by his 19-year bout of silence, they were still strong enough to ask for a refreshment.

Voice recovery has also been observed in patients with psychogenic aphonia (a poorly understood form of pathological voicelessness that usually occurs in patients with underlying psychological problems), even in people who could not speak for several years. One woman regained her voice during yoga, while another got it back the day before she would have lost her job. “For patients exhibiting the symptom of voicelessness” write the authors of this study, “not eliciting the voice immediately will not lead to a permanent aphonia.”

As for vocal fatigue, Plattner says that might be the bigger issue. One benefit of daily vocal exercise is a developed resistance to stress placed on the tissues of the voice box during prolonged bouts of singing or talking. Even if swallowing, coughing and pooping keeps your voice muscles from atrophying, it’s possible that limiting the utilization of these muscles might make them more susceptible to fatigue. Underutilized vocal muscles might also affect your range of pitch, which is something that can be trained through talking, and even more so through singing.

Brain Changes

But what about neurological changes – is there reason to believe that choosing not to speak could lead to adaptation in the brain?

According to Bijan Pesaran, an associate professor in NYU’s Center for Neural Science and an expert on the brain’s role in speech – there is. “Musicians with expert skills have enlarged [neural] representations for development processing, the same way athletes tend to have enlarged representations for spatial cognition.” Our ability to speak, and speak well, says Pesaran, is not unlike a well-developed skill. Using those parts of the brain dedicated to speech will make them stronger. Underusing them will make them weaker.

"If you stop speaking, the number of neurons that are active, or could be active, for that process will get smaller, and the neurons that were once active for speech will become co-opted to do other things". The most striking examples of this kind of neural reorganization occur when input of the function in question is cut off entirely. If you lose a finger, for example, the neural representations of the neighboring fingers get bigger. Sever someone’s optic nerve, and the neurons devoted to vision will be co-opted by neurons associated with other cognitive functions. “This is one reason blind people tend to have really excellent audio acuity” says Pesaran.

But at the same time, it’s reasonable to assume that the neural reorganization experienced by someone who chooses not to speak would be less dramatic than someone who – whether due to brain injury or nerve damage – is unable to speak. What’s more, says Pesaran, speech is about more than talking. “Even if you stop speaking, your not going to stop listening” he explains. The regions that handle motor control, and the ones that facilitate the production of speech, will probably shrink, “but the ones devoted to perception probably won’t change much if the person leads an otherwise normal social life.” That listening and speaking are all part of an integrated system could very well slow the rate at which neurons devoted to speech become co-opted by other cognitive processes.

[source]

Next Page » Page 1 of 181